Many people only notice good design when it is absent. A faucet that splashes too far, feels awkward in the hand, or sits slightly out of alignment can disrupt a routine in ways that are subtle yet persistent. These are small irritations, but they reveal a larger truth: the objects used every day often have […]
Chalk Zaldivar Fashions a Pointed Satire of Today’s Art Scene
Recommended Video
Artist Chalk Zaldivar has a lot to say about our institutions and how it affects the way we make and perceive art today in his recent exhibit at Vinyl on Vinyl, State of the Art. While it is a tongue-in-cheek exhibition with some silliness imbued in the artworks, there’s also a sense of righteous disdain to some of the practices found in the art world today, locally and internationally.

“Me, I like making concepts, making ideas for each show,” Zaldivar said. “So for this show, parang ‘wait, ano kaya, let’s poke fun at the whole industry.’ Since there’s a veil of seriousness and pretension with the whole art [scene].”
“It seems fun to talk about, you know, but no artist is willing to cross the line,” he added. “So since no one’s talking about it, [I] might as well add it naman din. And at least it creates conversation about the topic, makes people reassess it.”
Broad, Colorful Satire
The ten or so works that Chalk Zaldivar made for State of the Art appear to have a blunt sharpness in their satire. Most of the paintings are colorful, vividly deploying Zaldivar’s signature mix of broad cartoonish gestures and sprayed-on smiley faces to discuss the ideas surrounding the exhibit.
For Zaldivar, the cheekiness of the works are the point. One artwork, “Basahan,” finds the artist assembling and sewing together cheap rags with flowery designs used for household chores and then painting the word “AHHRT” over it. It’s a commentary on trendchasers, and the tendency of some people following what’s popular instead of cultivating their own style.

“It’s more of an observation [of the trend of textile art]. The trend is going big. And with trends of course, maraming sobrang galing; madami din na, you know, they’re in it for the trend also. Me as an artist, parang gusto ko ding sumali sa trend, itong wave ng textile art. So what better way to [than] using basahan; it’s a mockery of [the idea of] me making a textile work.”

A lot of the satire throughout State of the Art is that blunt. From “Allow Me to Manage Your Art,” which shows a person in a suit surrounded by a collection of artworks, to “The Death of Cutesy Art,” which shows a decapitated corpse of an animal-person hybrid as a hunter stands over it, Chalk Zaldivar cycles through different corporate art trends with the glibness of a Bugs Bunny cartoon.
How Does Money Affect the Art We Love?
Possibly the most pointed satire in all the paintings is “LYMTM,” an aerosol-on-canvas piece where Zaldivar sprays “Launder Your Money Through Me” in giant black letters on the canvas. It’s the simplest and bluntest work in the exhibit, one that attacks the inaccessibility of artworks for a broader mass audience.
“Financially, parang maraming ways naman to go around with art,” Zaldivar said. “Some buy it, buy it as a business expense, ganyan; to avoid taxes, ganon. Yung iba dirty money: they buy your art, then years later they sell it, and that’s how the money gets cleaned.”

Carlomar Daoana, who wrote the exhibit write-up, added that the financial component of the art world “robs other collectors of the opportunity to purchase works of artists they sincerely love at fair prices.” It becomes less about appreciating the artworks, he said, and more about profit and the prestige of making money with those prices.
“When wealthy individuals with no taste start dipping their toes into the art world, then you are pretty certain that most of the works they buy will end up in storage, only to be seen again when they decide that the market is ripe for it,” Daoana said.
Gatekeeping Prestige
Included in the exhibit are three glass plaques called the “TAA 2025,” which is short for “Tropahan Art Awards.” In there, Zaldivar’s satire is aimed at other artists, on the idea of the pursuit of validation from different institutions to be able to make a living with their works. How do artists adjust their artworks to find that validation from the gatekeepers of society?
“There’s a prestige with artists and institutions giving awards,” he said. “What does this all mean? What does a plaque signify? What does an award tell you?”
Zaldivar observed from the way his friends have received awards that the artists who become famous require more luck, opportunities, and their industry connections rather than the quality of the artworks themselves. He clarified that this did not mean that an artist is undeserving of an award, but it does mean that those who are vaulted to such prestige are less.
“It’s funny, [the] relationship ng artists [to the] awards na nakukuha nila, to the institutions that gives them. Because it’s important to some artists, [because it’s] how they make a living out of it. And what does an award really mean: nagbabago ba ang process natin? Nagiging mas financially free ba tayo when we get this? Do collectors flock to the people, to the artists that are given awards to? It’s funny lang, the whole dynamic of the systems involving award giving.”

Going Beyond Institutions
State of the Art does showcase an art world more obsessed with prestige than craft. And yet, a tenor of hope exists within the exhibit, which is that, whether within the system or outside of art, the kind of art that speaks to you continues to endure anyways.
For example, while mocking trendchasers for textile art, Chalk Zaldivar expressed his admiration for the people who really work with the form to show their creativity at work. “The really good ones, ang intricate ng process nila when it comes to this form of art,” he commented.

And Daoana added that regardless of how assimilated an artwork is in the mainstream, it can still commentate on that world even then. “I don’t think that an artwork’s potency diminishes when it integrates into the nebulous financial realm. With its discursive capabilities, an artwork can potentially critique the space that seeks to contain it,” he said.
In the end, State of the Art assesses the shortcoming that money and prestige puts in the art world, while still recognizing the amazing craft and creativity at the center of every creation in this world.
Photos by Elle Yap.
Related reading: ‘The Soup Can Factory’ Parodies Popular Culture and Consumerism
Frequently Asked Questions
The exhibit is a pointed satire of the contemporary art industry, aiming to “poke fun” at the pretension and self-seriousness of local and international scenes. Zaldivar uses broad, cartoonish gestures and bold imagery to critique how institutions, market trends, and financial motives often overshadow genuine creativity. By crossing the line into blunt social commentary, the artist hopes to spark a conversation that reassesses the current systems governing artistic production.
“Basahan” is a satirical commentary on the rising trend of textile art and the “trendchasers” who follow popular styles without individual conviction. By sewing together cheap household rags and painting the word “AHHRT” over them, Zaldivar mocks the idea of jumping on artistic waves for the sake of popularity. It serves as a visual joke that questions whether a medium is being used for its conceptual rigor or simply because it is currently “in.”
“LYMTM,” which stands for “Launder Your Money Through Me,” is an aerosol-on-canvas piece that directly attacks the use of high-end art for financial obfuscation and tax avoidance. The work highlights how “dirty money” can be cleaned through art speculation, a process that ultimately robs sincere collectors of fair prices and makes art inaccessible to the masses. It is considered the bluntest work in the exhibit, exposing the art world as a “nebulous financial realm” driven by profit.
The “TAA 2025” or “Tropahan Art Awards” are glass plaques created to satirize the pursuit of institutional validation and the gatekeeping of prestige. Zaldivar suggests that becoming a “famous” artist often relies more on luck and industry connections than the actual quality of the work. These pieces question what a plaque truly signifies and how the pressure to win awards can alter an artist’s creative process just to find favor with gatekeepers.
Despite its heavy satire, the exhibit maintains a “tenor of hope” by acknowledging that true craft and creativity still endure outside of corporate systems. Zaldivar expresses genuine admiration for artists who show deep intricate process and integrity in their work, regardless of mainstream trends. The exhibition suggests that while money and prestige may currently dominate the industry, the potency of art that truly speaks to an audience remains uncontainable.





