Recently, the news reported that the United Kingdom is sending looted artifacts from Ghana 150 years ago back to the country. All well and good, except the twist was these stolen Ghanaian artifacts were on loan from the British Museum, and were expected to be returned in six years. 

The front of the British Museum. Photo by Heather Kennedy. Source: Flickr.
The front of the British Museum. Photo by Heather Kennedy. Source: Flickr.

It revives an interesting question regarding the British “keeping” artifacts from other countries in their museums. Countries like Nigeria and Greece, looted by the British Empire at the peak of their imperial power, have been demanding the return of their historical artifacts for decades. Many of these artifacts are currently on display in the British Museum right now, to the consternation of these countries. 

In combination with recent and controversial losses and decay of artifacts currently in their purview, one has to wonder: why hasn’t the British government returned some of these artifacts to other countries. 

The Spoils of War?

The Ghanaian artifacts being returned were pillaged by the British in the 19th century. Included in these were multiple gold and silver relics from the Asante Royal Court. That includes a gold pipe, a ceremonial sword, and gold discs worn by the king. 

Other accounts have similar strength of force in how these looted artifacts were obtained. Nigeria’s Benin Bronzes were also looted from the country by the British in 1897 as retaliation for the massacre of unarmed British envoys in the country. 

The Benin Bronzes as shown in the British Museum. Photo by Warofdreams. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
The Benin Bronzes as shown in the British Museum. Photo by Warofdreams. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Over 23,000 Chinese artifacts are in the British Museum’s permanent collection. The British reportedly looted or stole them during its tumultuous 19th century period. (The British went through the first Opium War with China to force the country to continue buying their products).

A British nobleman took statues from the Parthenon in Athens, Greece to the United Kingdom. He claimed that the ruling Ottoman government permitted him to do so.

The Elgin Marbles from the Parthenon. Photo by Txllxt TxllxT. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
The Elgin Marbles from the Parthenon. Photo by Txllxt TxllxT. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

The British also took the Rosetta Stone, permanently displayed in the British Museum, from Egypt in 1801 after they were able to take possession of it from the French. (They were at war with France at the time).

In many of these stories, the British took the artifacts by force. It can be, and has very much been, argued that these artifacts do not belong to the British at all. They are part of other nations’ cultural heritage that the British is purposefully keeping from them despite their pleas of return. 

Why Won’t They Return Them?

The British government and academics are well-aware of the contested nature of many of their artifacts. The website for the British Museum literally contains a page on “contested objects.” So the question remains: why won’t the British return them?

The most blatant reason for the return isn’t the oft-repeated message that the artifacts are safer with them. Recent scandals on their handling have shown that this truism doesn’t stand up to reality. Rather, the most blatant reason is that the British have made it illegal for them to do so. 

A stool from the Asante Royal Court in the British Museum. Photo by Ji-Elle. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
A stool from the Asante Royal Court in the British Museum. Photo by Ji-Elle. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Forbes recently released an article that summarized different laws that prevent any sort of repatriation of cultural artifacts. The British Museum Act of 1963 prevents them from giving away any artifacts unless it’s a duplicate, which also applies to the broader National Heritage Act of 1983

The adviser to Ghana’s cultural ministry Nana Oforiatta Ayim herself has said that the Ghana loan was the best that they were able to do within the confines of the law. She said that Ghana sees the loan as a first step towards potential repatriation in the future. 

“We know the objects were stolen in violent circumstances, we know the items belong to the Asante people,” she said.

Repatriating Heritage

There appears to be no solution in sight for what can be done in this scenario. The British government has staunchly refused to push for reparations for any of their previously colonized states. And in the current political climate in the country, xenophobic beliefs may undermine any push towards it. 

But the importance of returning these items to their country of origin are clear: it is their culture, and it is their history, and seeing them in the context of where they belong creates a sense of national identity in their country that is more valuable than it is sitting in a museum thousands of miles away.

Related Reading: San Agustin Museum: A Legacy of Love in Art and Architecture

Mabini 180: Form Meets Purpose.

Mabini180: A New Community Hub Where Form Meets Purpose

Mabini180 is a community hub that houses cafes, a dance studio, a co-working office, an art gallery, and other lifestyle establishments. It derives its name from its address: 180 Mabini Street. However, more than being the driving force behind its name, the location inspired its design, which H1 Architecture crafted.  When H1 Architecture was tapped […]

The Ultimate Apartment Starter Kit for First-Time Movers.

The Ultimate Apartment Starter Kit for First-Time Movers

Every year often brings the exciting prospect of a fresh start, and for many, that means moving into their very first apartment. While the anticipation is thrilling, the reality of setting up a new home can feel overwhelming, especially when faced with a blank canvas. So, we’ve curated a practical apartment starter kit to provide […]

"Letting Go" by Pattpiha for "A Place to Let Go."

‘A Place to Let Go’: Pattpiha Takes a Journey of Self-Conviction Through Art

A Place to Let Go, the first exhibit of Pattpiha at Vinyl on Vinyl Gallery, works to capture the artist’s inner life. The exhibition adopts a chaotic, surrealistic look as a way of peering into the feelings of the author at this stage in their life.  A collection of paintings, sculptures, and various artistic touches […]

Carlo Calma and His Pursuit of Architectural Happiness

Beautifully designed spaces have the power to transcend their function. They evoke emotion, spark joy, and create meaningful connections through design. These choreographed experiences engage the senses, giving rise to a distinct sense of place infused with surprise, delight, and a sense of wonder. It’s what celebrated designer Carlo Calma, Creative Director of Carlo Calma […]

Tampipi House: Designing Outside the Box

The Tampipi House is a modern interpretation of Filipino design. Crafted by Carlo Calma, Creative Director of Carlo Calma Consultancy, the structure features a minimalist exterior, with the facade decked with small square cutouts—an ode to the tampipi, which is a traditional handwoven box with a lid.  Calma designed this house for a small family: […]

"Somewhere in France" exhibit by Manuel Baldemor.

‘Somewhere in France’: Manuel Baldemor Distills Parisian Nostalgia in Art

Somewhere in France is the newest exhibition from Alliance Française de Manille in Makati City. The exhibit opened on December 12, and will be viewable to the public until January 25. Centered around the artistry of Manuel Baldemor, it showcases his perspective of the French landscape, viewed specifically from his distinctive Filipino folk style.  Manuel […]

Download this month's BLUPRINT magazine digital copy from:
Subscribe via [email protected]