The Manila’Bang Show 2024 happened between November 14 to 17 at SPACE at OneAyala. The new venue gives artists and galleries an opportunity to showcase their art at the heart of the Makati Central Business District. With that in mind, BluPrint takes you on the ground of its opening day. Many galleries came out in […]
‘On Appropriation’ Explores the Nuances of Repurposing in Art
On Appropriation, the new exhibit at Faculty Projects, focuses on “contemporary visual culture” with regards to using pre-existing works by other artists in the past to craft new works which speaks to the artists of today. Curated by Patrick de Veyra, it digs down on the prevalence and importance of appropriation in social and art commentary as a whole.
Faculty Projects is an “artist-run initiative dedicated to fostering study, play and collaboration.” Their exhibits focus on academic ideas that could pop up in art school as a way to hone the craft. It provides an open space for discourse that goes beyond the typical classroom experience.
For this exhibit in particular, de Veyra set out to focus on the ubiquity of borrowing and recontextualizing pre-existing artworks and its importance to today’s society as a whole. “I want you to consider appropriation as a core process of artmaking in this particular show,” he said.
Making the New From the Old
Ten artists, including de Veyra, contributed to the works being shown in the exhibit. Among the ten artists who contributed include Soler Santos, Kiko Escora, Costantino Zicarelli, and Luis Antonio Santos. Many lean towards the transformative aspect of appropriation, as the artists seek to find new ideas in the old.
An example of this is Don Dalmacio’s “Camouflaged Copycat.” The artist uses Warhol’s cat paintings as inspiration, depicting a cat cycling through different colors as it attempts to hide itself from the audience.
Datu Arellano’s two works for the exhibit, meanwhile, carries the baggage of at least two levels of appropriation in the work. For “INSOMNIAC” and “PESSIMIST,” he cuts up Japanese manga into strips that he combines to create collages.
The end product re-appropriates the artwork of post-conceptual artist Christopher Wool, and navigates the plane between “randomness and intentionality.” Stylistically, it also harkens back to the idea of “glitch art,” putting the ephemeral nature of this art form center stage.
Reappropriating Architecture
Two works featured here were inspired by architectural design. Miguel Lorenzo Uy’s “Black Painting (Symmetry)” uses a photo of a structure that he then made into a “bilateral symmetrical” work. The painting utilizes three different pigments of black to allow the image to come to life despite its darkness.
Celine Lee’s “Untitled,” meanwhile, appropriates architectural templates to create the unique thread work on a grey canvas of aida cloth. The canvas looks like a matrix field in the midst of unravelling. It adds further dimensionality to the final artwork, giving the feel of being undone and opened to the empty world before us.
“I’ve been doing works on aida cloth since 2017,” she said. “It was initially about a representation of an unseen dimension by looking at the cloth as a cartesian plane. Now it has evolved to have its own life by becoming its own iconography.”
Commenting on Society Today
Probably the most intriguing work of the exhibit is MM YU’s “image may contain:.” The artist uses a collection of Polaroids of images lost online. Instead of showing the actual pictures, it shows the different metatexts and icons that indicate a work deleted or lost in time.
That work really expands what “appropriation” could mean in this context. It points out that missing art leaves a void that can only be taken from context clues, and how that, in itself, forms a new type of art and discussion built around what’s missing.
De Veyra’s own work for the exhibit, “Après moi, le déluge I-II,” adopts public domain images of a broken angel’s head and immerses them in paint with brushstrokes that “depict objects overwhelmed by a deluge.”
“[The painting serves] as a visual representation of the expression of nihilistic indifference famously attributed to King Louis XV,” he said. “[My] work also comments on the history of painting, appropriation, and the ebb and flow of Western art history.”
Interconnectivity of Art
On Appropriation clearly gives its audience a lot to ruminate about with regards to the visual language of art. While most artists and art students know that every movement builds itself on top of each other, this exhibit really pushes how interconnected everything is. It all connects, in conversation with each other, mapping out where we were and where we can go.
Related reading: ‘The Soup Can Factory’ Parodies Popular Culture and Consumerism