Bigkis is the act of binding. In Tagalog, the word can refer to something used to bind or encircle, as well as a bundle formed by tying several separate elements together. Figuratively, it can also mean a bond, union, or unity. The meanings move from the physical act of joining things together to the connection […]
Artist Files Lawsuit After Denied Copyright for AI-Generated Artwork
Jason M. Allen, the “artist” infamously known for winning an art contest with AI-generated artwork, sued the U.S. copyright office over their decision to reject his petition for copyright protection for the award-winning artwork.
The artwork, “Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial,” became controversial after it won the Colorado State Fair’s art competition in 2022. Allen created the artwork with the generative-AI image creator Midjourney.
Are Prompts Human Authorship?
Allen claimed that the rejection of the artwork’s copyright protection gave him “no recourse against others who are blatantly and repeatedly stealing” the AI-generated artwork. He claimed that he lost millions of dollars over the lack of credit.
Allen pushed the idea that he has authorship over the image due to the concept being his idea. The artist reiterated that he used Midjounrey only as “a tool” to create the work. The lawsuit claims that the AI-generated artwork underwent 624 iterations, with hundreds of different prompts. He estimated that he did over 110 hours fine-tuning the prompt to generate what he wanted.
“Through 624 iterations, he noted the results produced by each word and its placement within the prompt,” the lawsuit claimed. “By studying the AI’s behavior, he learned when Midjourney focused on specific parts of his instructions and when it ignored them altogether.”
No Copyright for Machine-Made Portions of AI Art
The Copyright Review Board, in their decision to reject Allen’s copyright claim, said that he refused to disclaim the portions of the work generated by AI. While they recognized his contributions and edits to the piece, he tried to claim the portions of the AI-generated artwork made by Midjourney, and rejected the request and his multiple appeals.
“The Office accepted Mr. Allen’s claim that human-authored ‘visual edits’ made with Adobe Photoshop contained a sufficient amount of original authorship to be registered,” the Board said. “However, the Office explained that the features generated by Midjourney and Gigapixel AI must be excluded as non-human authorship. Because Mr. Allen sought to register the entire work and refused to disclaim the portions attributable to AI, the Office could not register the claim.”
The United States government remains consistent in refusing to grant copyright for AI-generated artwork. Their official AI policy requires humans to be the author of the piece. They do not consider crafting a prompt for a machine to create the output “authorship.”
“For example, when an AI technology receives solely a prompt from a human and produces complex written, visual, or musical works in response, the ‘traditional elements of authorship’ are determined and executed by the technology—not the human user,” the guide said.
“[Users do not exercise ultimate creative control over how such systems interpret prompts and generate material,” they continued. “Instead, these prompts function more like instructions to a commissioned artist—they identify what the prompter wishes to have depicted, but the machine determines how those instructions are implemented in its output.”
Why Jason Allen’s Colorado State Fair Win Still Divides Artists and AI Critics
Allen’s win at the time was controversial. Many recoiled at the win, largely due to the unethical way generative AI trains their apps on scrapped images from other people’s work.
Allen submitted “Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial” in the “digital art/digitally manipulated photography” category. He also submitted two other space-themed works. He disclosed to the fair the involvement of AI to the work. The fair found that Midjourney fit into the rules of digital technology used to craft artworks. The judges did not know the work was AI-generated, but said it would have won regardless.
Artists and online users found the win distasteful, especially while many artists sue AI companies for lost income and copyright violations in scrapping their works and styles. At the time, Allen was unapologetic about his win, or concerns over the unethicalness of the technology. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost,” he said at the time.
AI-generated images sourced from Wikimedia Commons under public domain.
Related reading: Artists Pivot to Cara as Anti-AI Sentiment Grows Among Artists
Frequently Asked Questions
The Copyright Review Board rejected the claim because Allen refused to disclaim the portions of the artwork generated by Midjourney and Gigapixel AI, seeking to register the entire work rather than only his human-authored Photoshop edits.
U.S. copyright policy requires a human author and does not recognize prompting an AI system as authorship, reasoning that the AI — not the human — determines and executes the traditional creative elements of the resulting work.
Allen argued that his creative control came from 624 iterations and roughly 110 hours of prompt refinement with Midjourney, claiming he learned how specific words and their placement influenced the AI’s output.
“Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial” was a Midjourney-generated image Allen submitted in the fair’s digital art category in 2022; he disclosed AI involvement beforehand, and judges said it would have won the category regardless.
The win drew criticism from artists and online users partly because generative AI tools like Midjourney are trained on scraped images from other artists’ work without consent, raising broader concerns about AI and copyright.
Two sketches of Singapore connect BluPrint Editor in Chief Paulo G. Alcazaren’s personal and professional history with Shared Ground: ArchitectureArchitectureThe art and science of designing and constructing buildings, structures, and spaces that are functional, safe, and aesthetically pleasing. It encompasses the planning, design, materials, and techniques used to createGo to Architecture Glossary of Care, Culture, […]
Some have become household names – Coleman, Oster, and KitchenAid – products that have found their way into Filipino kitchens, homes and family routines. In home furnishings, brands such as B&B Italia, Ethan Allen, Sub-Zero, Miele, SieMatic, Louis Poulsen, Hunter Douglas, Tempur, and Technogym, have helped shape the way Filipinos live. From everyday essentials to […]
In a way, designers are the modern-day soothsayers and prophets. They design for the future, predicting how a room, a house, a building or a whole city will be used by people. They foresee how users will interact with a space, conjure exact shades of colors to elicit specific behavior and arrange furniture to build […]
Art and furniture are often selected separately, yet their relationship can shape how a room looks and feels. The collaboration between Hooga and Galerie Joaquin explores how these elements can work together, bringing contemporary artworks into furnished residential settings at Hooga’s showroom in Uptown Mall, Bonifacio Global City. For Hooga, which curates furniture, lighting, and […]
How can better-planned cities create the conditions for more creative, livable, and resilient urban environments? “Makati Urban Recipes for a City’s Survival,” a colloquium held at the Ayala Museum on September 15, brought together architects and practitioners from the fields of urbanism and the creative economy to discuss how design, planning, and collaboration can address […]
Read the issues.
Collect the volumes.
Recommended Video
Tap to Unmute
Unmute
0:00
0:00