News

Artist Files Lawsuit After Denied Copyright for AI-Generated Artwork

|
By 
Elle Yap

Jason M. Allen, the “artist” infamously known for winning an art contest with AI-generated artwork, sued the U.S. copyright office over their decision to reject his petition for copyright protection for the award-winning artwork. 

A work submitted by Jason M. Allen for the Colorado State Fair.
A work submitted by Jason M. Allen for the Colorado State Fair.

The artwork, “Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial,” became controversial after it won the Colorado State Fair’s art competition in 2022. Allen created the artwork with the generative-AI image creator Midjourney.

Are Prompts Human Authorship?

Allen claimed that the rejection of the artwork’s copyright protection gave him “no recourse against others who are blatantly and repeatedly stealing” the AI-generated artwork. He claimed that he lost millions of dollars over the lack of credit.

Allen pushed the idea that he has authorship over the image due to the concept being his idea. The artist reiterated that he used Midjounrey only as “a tool” to create the work. The lawsuit claims that the AI-generated artwork underwent 624 iterations, with hundreds of different prompts. He estimated that he did over 110 hours fine-tuning the prompt to generate what he wanted. 

The earlier AI-generated version of “Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial" with no edits from Jason M. Allen.
The earlier AI-generated version of “Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial” with no edits from Jason M. Allen.

“Through 624 iterations, he noted the results produced by each word and its placement within the prompt,” the lawsuit claimed. “By studying the AI’s behavior, he learned when Midjourney focused on specific parts of his instructions and when it ignored them altogether.”

No Copyright for Machine-Made Portions of AI Art

The Copyright Review Board, in their decision to reject Allen’s copyright claim, said that he refused to disclaim the portions of the work generated by AI. While they recognized his contributions and edits to the piece, he tried to claim the portions of the AI-generated artwork made by Midjourney, and rejected the request and his multiple appeals. 

“The Office accepted Mr. Allen’s claim that human-authored ‘visual edits’ made with Adobe Photoshop contained a sufficient amount of original authorship to be registered,” the Board said. “However, the Office explained that the features generated by Midjourney and Gigapixel AI must be excluded as non-human authorship. Because Mr. Allen sought to register the entire work and refused to disclaim the portions attributable to AI, the Office could not register the claim.”

Front facade of the US Supreme Court Building. Photo by Kjetil Ree. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Front facade of the US Supreme Court Building. Photo by Kjetil Ree. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

The United States government remains consistent in refusing to grant copyright for AI-generated artwork. Their official AI policy requires humans to be the author of the piece. They do not considered crafting a prompt for a machine to create the output “authorship.” 

“For example, when an AI technology receives solely a prompt from a human and produces complex written, visual, or musical works in response, the ‘traditional elements of authorship’ are determined and executed by the technology—not the human user,” the guide said. 

“[Users do not exercise ultimate creative control over how such systems interpret prompts and generate material,” they continued. “Instead, these prompts function more like instructions to a commissioned artist—they identify what the prompter wishes to have depicted, but the machine determines how those instructions are implemented in its output.”

Continued Tensions Over AI-Generated Artwork

Allen’s win at the time was controversial. Many recoiled at the win, largely due to the unethical way generative AI trains their apps on scrapped images from other people’s work.

Allen submitted “Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial” in the “digital art/digitally manipulated photography” category. He also submitted two other space-themed works. He disclosed to the fair the involvement of AI to the work. The fair found that Midjourney fit into the rules of digital technology used to craft artworks. The judges did not know the work was AI-generated, but said it would have won regardless. 

A work submitted by Jason M. Allen for the Colorado State Fair.
A work submitted by Jason M. Allen for the Colorado State Fair.

Artists and online users found the win distasteful, especially while many artists sue AI companies for lost income and copyright violations in scrapping their works and styles. At the time, Allen was unapologetic about his win, or concerns over the unethicalness of the technology. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost,” he said at the time.

AI-generated images sourced from Wikimedia Commons under public domain.

Related reading: Artists Pivot to Cara as Anti-AI Sentiment Grows Among Artists

"Portals," an exhibit at Gravity Art Space.

‘Portals’: Exploring Pathways and Connections in Art

For Portals, artists Ikang Gonzales and Isaac Sion give their own differing interpretations on pathways and how they connect us to larger realms and spaces. This Gravity Art Space exhibit mixes the two’s differing sensibilities into a united idea on the ways we build connections even within the walls that we create for ourselves.   “It […]

Ballet Philippines' artistic director and dancers posing beside the Peter Pan poster.

Ballet Philippines Presents a Reimagined Adaptation of Peter Pan

Start the holiday season with a treat for the whole family. Enjoy Ballet Philippines’ staging of the beloved classic Peter Pan. This production presents a fresh interpretation that will take the audience on a magical adventure. “This is an absolutely new version. I specifically didn’t watch any sites to [see] something similar,” Ballet Philippines’ Artistic […]

Tekla Tamoria's exhibit at Finale Art File.

Finale Art File Opens Three New Exhibits for November

For their November line-up of exhibits, Finale Art File in Chino Roces, Makati featured three artists with incisive individual styles that craft an interesting perspective into how we see artistry as a whole.  The three exhibits for this month feature textile artist Tekla Tamoria and painters Tiffany Lafuente and Garryloid Pomoy. These artists explore color […]

Tile Drenching Is the Ultimate Playful Way to Cover Surfaces.

Your Ultimate Guide to Tile Drenching

In recent years, the design industry experienced a bold shift towards the lavish use of colors and decor. This increasing appetite for abundant details led to a more leveled-up approach through the creative incorporation of extensive patterns and textures. One of the most playful methods to exhibit this trend is by covering a whole space […]

Works by Alvin Zafra for Artinformal's "Miragen."

‘Miragen’: Alvin Zafra Crafts a Vision of Darkness

For Miragen, artist Alvin Zafra aimed to create an urban landscape that reflected how he saw the world around him. The new Artinformal exhibit plays with light and dimension, conceiving a vision of darkness filled with optical illusions of city life.  Zafra’s work for Miragen was partially influenced by his own vision impairment. His need […]

Protected: “Visions in Glass” Celebrates the Unique Artistry of Ramon Orlina

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Download this month's BLUPRINT magazine digital copy from:
Subscribe via [email protected]